Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs GeForce 930M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is positioned at rank 85 and the GeForce 930M is on rank 153, so the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

355%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

341%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

337%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

337%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

336%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

334%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

330%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

329%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

325%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

321%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

320%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

315%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

314%

#70

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

392%

#79

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

71%

#80

GeForce RTX 5090

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700

71%

#81

Moore Threads MTT S80

MSRP: $260|Avg: $170

68%

#85

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#86

Radeon R5 A6-7480

MSRP: $35|Avg: $30

98%

#87

GeForce GT 710

MSRP: $35|Avg: $50

87%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

79%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

78%

#92

Radeon HD 7730

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

76%

#93

Radeon 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

72%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

70%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

68%

#99

Radeon R7 430

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

68%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 930M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

97%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

95%

#143

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

322%

#145

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

292%

#146

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

291%

#150

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

265%

#151

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

263%

#153

GeForce 930M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

99%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 930M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

Insight	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	GeForce 930M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 930M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Benchmark Check

GeForce 930M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and GeForce 930M

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

GeForce 930M

The GeForce 930M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) scores 1,000 and the GeForce 930M reaches 1,011 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is built on GCN while the GeForce 930M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 384 (GeForce 930M).

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	GeForce 930M
G3D Mark Score	1,000	1,011+1%
Architecture	GCN	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	GeForce 930M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	GeForce 930M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 11.0 (GeForce 930M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	GeForce 930M
DirectX	12_0+9%	11.0
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 930M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP6.

Feature	Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)	GeForce 930M
Encoder	VCE 2.0	NVENC 2.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) draws 30W versus the GeForce 930M's 33W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) vs 350W (GeForce 930M). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.