CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 430
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 430 is positioned at rank 99 and the Radeon R9 M275 is on rank 543, so the Radeon R7 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 430
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 430.
| Insight | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 430 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 430 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $300), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1860.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1860.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 430 and Radeon R9 M275
Radeon R7 430
The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon R9 M275
The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 430 scores 1,093 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 430 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 430) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,093 | 1,115+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS+69% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz+5% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 430) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon R7 430 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 430 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M275 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 430) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.9 | 14.9+37% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 430 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon R7 430 costs 95% less ($285 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.9 (Radeon R7 430) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 1870.3% better value. The Radeon R7 430 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R9 M275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-74% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-95% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.9+1870% | 3.7 |
| Codename | Trinidad | Venus |
| Release | June 18 2015 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #467 | #851 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 430 and Radeon R9 M275
