Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R9 M275

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R9 M275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R9 M275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 430

2015

Why buy it

✅72.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 272.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M275

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 430 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
279.7% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 13.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 430 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 72.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M275 instead at 1,115 vs 1,093, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 430 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $221 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 272.3% (13.8 vs 3.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R9 M275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 430

The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 430 scores 1,093 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 430 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 430) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 430	Radeon R9 M275
G3D Mark Score	1,093	1,115+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+60%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.997 TFLOPS+69%	1.184 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	975 MHz+5%	925 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	256 KB+60%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 430	Radeon R9 M275
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 430 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 430) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon R7 430 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 430	Radeon R9 M275
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	64 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 430 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M275 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 430) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 430	Radeon R9 M275
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	10.9	14.9+37%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 430 came in at $79, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 430 was 73.7% cheaper ($221 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.8 (Radeon R7 430) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 273% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 430 (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R7 430	Radeon R9 M275
MSRP	$79-74%	$300
Performance per Dollar	13.8+273%	3.7
Codename	Trinidad	Venus
Release	June 18 2015	January 28 2014
Ranking	#467	#851

Search Radeon R7 430 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M275 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.