
Radeon R7 450
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7700-serie
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 450 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 450 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7700-serie offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7700-serie holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $35), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 450 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 450 and Radeon HD 7700-serie

Radeon R7 450
The Radeon R7 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,887 points.

Radeon HD 7700-serie
The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 450 scores 1,887 and the Radeon HD 7700-serie reaches 1,899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7700-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 450) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 450) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie).
| Feature | Radeon R7 450 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,887 | 1,899 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+363% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 450 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 450 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 450 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 450) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 450 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 450 draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 250W — a 127.9% difference. The Radeon R7 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon R7 450) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 450 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-78% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-44% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 34.3+351% | 7.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 450 launched at $219 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159 and now averages $35. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.9 (Radeon R7 450) vs 54.3 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie offers 0.7% better value. The Radeon R7 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R7 450 | Radeon HD 7700-serie |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219 | $159-27% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $35 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.9 | 54.3 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Tahiti |
| Release | July 6 2016 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #667 | #431 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















