Radeon R7 A10-7700K
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon R7 A10-7700K vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is positioned at rank #475 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7700K

#465
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2137%
#467
1937%
#468
1932%
#472
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1757%
#473
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1745%
#475
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: $118
100%
#476
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#477
99%
#479
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP: $699|Avg: $150
99%
#480
Radeon R5 M330
MSRP: $120|Avg: $20
98%
#481
Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
98%
#482
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#483
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
97%
#484
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#485
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
95%
#486
94%
#487
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
94%
#488
94%
#489
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
94%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2531.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-7700K.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-7700KGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2531.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2531.1%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $118), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1008.8% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 A10-7700K.

InsightRadeon R7 A10-7700KGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1008.8%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($118)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7700K and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 772 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A10-7700K scores 772 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 2531.1%. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 152.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
772
20,312+2531%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048
4864+138%
Compute (TFLOPS)
20.48 TFLOPS+26%
16.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2500 MHz+50%
1665 MHz
ROPs
64
80+25%
TMUs
128
152+19%
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
4.8 MB+860%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
32
38+19%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
448 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
100W-50%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
7.7
101.6+1219%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K launched at $152 MSRP and currently averages $118, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K costs 57.9% less ($162 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1015.4% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureRadeon R7 A10-7700KGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$152-62%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$118-58%
$280
Performance per Dollar
6.5
72.5+1015%
Codename
Navi 33
GA104
Release
January 4 2023
December 1 2020
Ranking
#140
#73