Radeon R7 A10-7700K vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is positioned at rank #475 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7700K

#465

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2137%

#467

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1937%

#468

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1932%

#472

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1757%

#473

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1745%

#475

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: $118

100%

#476

Mobility Radeon HD 5730

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#477

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

99%

#479

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

MSRP: $699|Avg: $150

99%

#480

Radeon R5 M330

MSRP: $120|Avg: $20

98%

#481

Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

98%

#482

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#483

GeForce GTX 760A

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

97%

#484

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

95%

#485

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

95%

#486

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

94%

#487

Radeon R7 M260

MSRP: $110|Avg: $110

94%

#488

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

94%

#489

Radeon R7 A10-7800

MSRP: $155|Avg: $30

94%

#490

Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 919.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A10-7700K.

Insight	Radeon R7 A10-7700K	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-919.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+919.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $118 for the Radeon R7 A10-7700K, it costs 36% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1503.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 A10-7700K	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1503.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($118)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 A10-7700K Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A10-7700K and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 772 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A10-7700K scores 772 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 919.3%. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7700K	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	772	7,869+919%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2048+129%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.48 TFLOPS+586%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2500 MHz+50%	1665 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	512 KB	896 KB+75%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7700K	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon R7 A10-7700K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7700K	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon R7 A10-7700K	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	7.7	104.9+1262%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A10-7700K launched at $152 MSRP and currently averages $118, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 36.4% less ($43 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1513.8% better value. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).