Radeon R7 A8-7600
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 A8-7600 vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7600

2023Core: 1720 MHzBoost: 2655 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is positioned at rank #191 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7600

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1114%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1071%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1058%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1056%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1054%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1048%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1035%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1031%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1022%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1019%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1006%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1004%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
986%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
986%
#96
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
95%
#176
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1229%
#191
Radeon R7 A8-7600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $25
100%
#192
GeForce GTS 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
99%
#193
Radeon HD 7310
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
98%
#194
RADEON HD6370D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#195
GeForce GT 625
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
96%
#196
Radeon HD 5600/5700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
95%
#197
GeForce GT 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
95%
#199
GeForce GT 705
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
95%
#200
Radeon HD 7340
MSRP: $25|Avg: $5
94%
#201
Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
91%
#202
GeForce GT 320
MSRP: $79|Avg: $30
91%
#203
Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
90%
#204
Radeon HD 7580D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
90%
#205
Radeon HD 7470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
89%
#206
Radeon R5 A240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 915.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7600.

InsightRadeon R7 A8-7600GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-915.4%)
Leading raw performance (+915.4%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 238.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 A8-7600.

InsightRadeon R7 A8-7600GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+238.5%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A8-7600 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7600

The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $269.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 A8-7600 scores 775 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 915.4%. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R7 A8-7600) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7600) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7600GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
775
7,869+915%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+129%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
21.75 TFLOPS+629%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2655 MHz+59%
1665 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+129%
56
L1 Cache
512 KB
896 KB+75%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7600GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A8-7600 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7600) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon R7 A8-7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7600GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A8-7600 draws 165W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7600) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7600GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
165W
75W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
4.7
104.9+2132%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A8-7600 launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 costs 66.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7600) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 238.4% better value. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7600GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$119-20%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$25-67%
$75
Performance per Dollar
31.0
104.9+238%
Codename
Navi 33
TU117
Release
May 24 2023
April 23 2019
Ranking
#118
#323