Radeon R7 A8-7680 vs Radeon HD 4810
Radeon R7 A8-7680
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is positioned at rank 90 and the Radeon HD 4810 is on rank 113, so the Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7680
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4810
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Radeon R7 A8-7680 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4810.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (246mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A8-7680 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 53.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A8-7680 and Radeon HD 4810
Radeon R7 A8-7680
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 791 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 scores 791 and the Radeon HD 4810 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4810 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4810). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 791+2% | 775 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+28% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS+47% | 1.36 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+60% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4810) — the Radeon R7 A8-7680 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+19% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs None (Radeon HD 4810). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 4810's 190W — a 62.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4810). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 246mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-47% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 246mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.9+93% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A8-7680 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70 and now averages $15. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.1 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 51.7 (Radeon HD 4810) — the Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers 53% better value. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7680 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-29% | $70 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.1+53% | 51.7 |
| Codename | Trinidad | RV790 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #467 | #762 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A8-7680 and Radeon HD 4810
