Radeon R7 A8-7680 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7680

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 A8-7680 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A8-7680 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A8-7680 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A8-7680

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $119 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Delivers 231.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

2025

Why buy it

  • 7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 238% HIGHER MSRP
    $169 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (806 vs 791), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7680 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $119 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 231.7% (15.8 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-7680 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 A8-7680 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7680

The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 791 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A8-7680 scores 791 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7680Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
G3D Mark Score
791
806+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Bristol Ridge
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1024
4096+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS
47.84 TFLOPS+2296%
Boost Clock
975 MHz
2920 MHz+199%
ROPs
32
128+300%
TMUs
64
256+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
8 MB+1500%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7680Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7680 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7680Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
8 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7680Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
DirectX
12
12
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7680Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 6.0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A8-7680 draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7680Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
TDP
100W-67%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
7.9+193%
2.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A8-7680 came in at $50, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7680 was 70.4% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers 229.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7680Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP
$50-70%
$169
Performance per Dollar
15.8+229%
4.8
Codename
Trinidad
Navi 48
Release
June 18 2015
July 23 2025
Ranking
#467
#23

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.