Radeon R7 A8-7690K
VS
Radeon 610M

Radeon R7 A8-7690K vs Radeon 610M

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is positioned at rank 97 and the Radeon 610M is on rank 346, so the Radeon R7 A8-7690K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7690K

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
509%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
489%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
483%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
482%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
481%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
478%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
472%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
471%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
466%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
465%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
459%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
458%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
450%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
450%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
97%
#82
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
561%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
87%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
86%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
100%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
97%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
97%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
95%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
92%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
88%
#107
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
83%
#108
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
83%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
83%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
80%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M

#336
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
938%
#338
851%
#339
848%
#343
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
771%
#344
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
766%
#346
Radeon 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
98%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
94%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
93%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
92%
#361
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7690K lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7690K.

InsightRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A8-7690K and Radeon 610M

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon 610M

The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A8-7690K scores 1,141 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
G3D Mark Score
1,141
1,157+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1024+700%
128
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+255%
0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz
2200 MHz+126%
ROPs
32+700%
4
TMUs
64+700%
8
L1 Cache
256 KB+700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 2 MB (Radeon 610M) — the Radeon 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 610M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
DirectX
12
12 (12_2)
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 610M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 4.0.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A8-7690K draws 100W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
TDP
100W
15W-85%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
11.4
77.1+576%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7690KRadeon 610M
MSRP
$80
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
Trinidad
Dragon Range
Release
June 18 2015
January 3 2023
Ranking
#467
#843