Radeon R7 M260X vs GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon R7 M260X
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 M260X is positioned at rank #410 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 893.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M260X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-893.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+893.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $60), it costs 42% less, resulting in a 479.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+479.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M260X and GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon R7 M260X
The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 M260X scores 1,013 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 893.5%. The Radeon R7 M260X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 715 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,013 | 10,064+893% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+1516% |
| Boost Clock | 715 MHz | 1733 MHz+142% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 160+567% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 960 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M260X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 M260X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M260X draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon R7 M260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-58% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 173mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.5 | 55.9+314% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Radeon R7 M260X costs 41.7% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.9 (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 480.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-44% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-42% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.9 | 167.7+480% |
| Codename | Opal | GP104 |
| Release | December 6 2015 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #878 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M260X and GeForce GTX 1060
