Radeon R7 M260X
VS
Radeon 530

Radeon R7 M260X vs Radeon 530

AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 530

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 M260X is positioned at rank #410 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260X

#400
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1489%
#402
1350%
#403
1347%
#407
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1224%
#408
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1216%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
100%
#411
99%
#412
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
98%
#413
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
98%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
97%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
95%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
95%
#419
95%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
94%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
94%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 530 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M260X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M260X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M260X holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $49), it costs 29% less, resulting in a 36.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+36.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M260X and Radeon 530

AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

AMD

Radeon 530

The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M260X scores 1,013 and the Radeon 530 reaches 1,037 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M260X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 530 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 384 (Radeon 530). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530). Boost clocks: 715 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
G3D Mark Score
1,013
1,037+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+43%
Boost Clock
715 MHz
1024 MHz+43%
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
96 KB
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M260X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 530 has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 M260X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 128 KB (Radeon 530) — the Radeon R7 M260X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
OpenGL
4.3
4.6+7%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 M260X) vs H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon 530).

FeatureRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 3.0
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M260X draws 75W versus the Radeon 530's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 350W (Radeon 530). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
75-12%
Perf/Watt
13.5
20.7+53%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon 530 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Radeon R7 M260X costs 28.6% less ($14 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.9 (Radeon R7 M260X) vs 21.2 (Radeon 530) — the Radeon R7 M260X offers 36.3% better value. The Radeon 530 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 M260XRadeon 530
MSRP
$139
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$35-29%
$49
Performance per Dollar
28.9+36%
21.2
Codename
Opal
Weston
Release
December 6 2015
April 18 2017
Ranking
#878
#873