Radeon R7 M440 vs Radeon 6750M
Radeon R7 M440
Popular choices:
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M440 is positioned at rank 586 and the Radeon 6750M is on rank 182, so the Radeon 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M440
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M440.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M440 | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $300), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1113.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M440 | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1113.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M440 and Radeon 6750M
Radeon R7 M440
The Radeon R7 M440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 891 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 901 points.
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M440 scores 901 and the Radeon 6750M reaches 911 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M440 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 M440) vs 480 (Radeon 6750M). Raw compute: 0.5702 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M440) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M440 | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 901 | 911+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 480+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5702 TFLOPS | 0.576 TFLOPS+1% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | 24+20% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB+67% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M440 | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R7 M440) vs 256 KB (Radeon 6750M) — the Radeon 6750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M440 | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M440 draws 75W versus the Radeon 6750M's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M440) vs 350W (Radeon 6750M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M440 | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 35W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0 | 26.0+117% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6750M costs 91.7% less ($275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.0 (Radeon R7 M440) vs 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) — the Radeon 6750M offers 1113.3% better value. The Radeon R7 M440 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M440 | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $25-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.0 | 36.4+1113% |
| Codename | Meso | Whistler |
| Release | May 15 2016 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #912 | #905 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M440 and Radeon 6750M
