Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is positioned at rank #207 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
96%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
95%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
93%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
93%
#192
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2793%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
100%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
97%
#210
GRID K240Q
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
96%
#211
FirePro M4150
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#212
FirePro V4900
MSRP: $200|Avg: $47
95%
#213
GRID K160Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
95%
#215
Quadro
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
95%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
94%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
92%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3129.3% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B.

InsightRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700BGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3129.3%)
Leading raw performance (+3129.3%)
Longevity
RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $89), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 926.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B.

InsightRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700BGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+926.4%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($89)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B scores 629 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 3129.3%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is built on Bristol Ridge while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 128 Tensor cores vs 152.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700BGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
629
20,312+3129%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge
Ampere
Process Node
4 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096
4864+19%
Compute (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS+195%
16.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2920 MHz+75%
1665 MHz
ROPs
128+60%
80
TMUs
256+68%
152
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
64+68%
38
Tensor Cores
128
152+19%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700BGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700BGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
448 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700BGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
300W
200W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
2.1
101.6+4738%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $89, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B costs 68.2% less ($191 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 921.1% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700BGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$119-70%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$89-68%
$280
Performance per Dollar
7.1
72.5+921%
Codename
Navi 48
GA104
Release
July 23 2025
December 1 2020
Ranking
#23
#73