Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B vs Radeon R7 M340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is positioned at rank 207 and the Radeon R7 M340 is on rank 464, so the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

96%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

95%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

93%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

93%

#192

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2793%

#207

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

MSRP: $119|Avg: $89

100%

#208

Tesla K8

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

97%

#210

GRID K240Q

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

96%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

96%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

95%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

95%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

95%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

94%

#219

FirePro W7000 Adapter

MSRP: $899|Avg: $15

92%

#220

Quadro K420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M340

#454

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2018%

#456

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1829%

#457

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1825%

#461

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1659%

#462

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1648%

#464

Radeon R7 M340

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

100%

#465

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

MSRP: $200|Avg: $100

100%

#466

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#467

Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#468

Radeon R5 M230

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

99%

#469

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

98%

#470

Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

98%

#471

Radeon R9 M370X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

97%

#472

Radeon HD 8280

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#473

GeForce GTX 850A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

95%

#474

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#475

Mobility Radeon HD 5730

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

94%

#476

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: $118

94%

#477

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

94%

#479

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

MSRP: $699|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M340 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B	Radeon R7 M340
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $35 versus $89 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B, it costs 61% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 161.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B	Radeon R7 M340
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+161.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($89)	✅More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 M340 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B and Radeon R7 M340

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon R7 M340

The Radeon R7 M340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 646 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B scores 629 and the Radeon R7 M340 reaches 646 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon R7 M340 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 640 (Radeon R7 M340). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M340). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 915 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B	Radeon R7 M340
G3D Mark Score	629	646+3%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge	GCN 1.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4096+540%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	47.84 TFLOPS+3985%	1.171 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2920 MHz+219%	915 MHz
ROPs	128+700%	16
TMUs	256+540%	40
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B	Radeon R7 M340
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M340) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B	Radeon R7 M340
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+3100%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B draws 300W versus the Radeon R7 M340's 75W — a 120% difference. The Radeon R7 M340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B	Radeon R7 M340
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	2.1	8.6+310%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $89, while the Radeon R7 M340 launched at $120 and now averages $35. The Radeon R7 M340 costs 60.7% less ($54 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.1 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) vs 18.5 (Radeon R7 M340) — the Radeon R7 M340 offers 160.6% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).