
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs FirePro W2100

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Popular choices:

FirePro W2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is positioned at rank 173 and the FirePro W2100 is on rank 190, so the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W2100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $86 for the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600, it costs 65% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 191.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+191.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($86) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 and FirePro W2100

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

FirePro W2100
The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 scores 837 and the FirePro W2100 reaches 851 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the FirePro W2100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 320 (FirePro W2100). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 0.4352 TFLOPS (FirePro W2100). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 837 | 851+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+1820% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+13990% | 0.4352 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+267% | 680 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+2300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 384+1820% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+3650% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W2100 has 2 GB. The FirePro W2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W2100) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 draws 295W versus the FirePro W2100's 26W — a 167.6% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 350W (FirePro W2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 26W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8 | 32.7+1068% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $86, while the FirePro W2100 launched at $139 and now averages $30. The FirePro W2100 costs 65.1% less ($56 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.7 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 28.4 (FirePro W2100) — the FirePro W2100 offers 192.8% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $119-14% | $139 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $86 | $30-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7 | 28.4+193% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Oland |
| Release | April 13 2023 | August 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #26 | #910 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















