
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 vs Radeon R7 M365X

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M365X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is positioned at rank 173 and the Radeon R7 M365X is on rank 602, so the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M365X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M365X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M365X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $86 versus $300 for the Radeon R7 M365X, it costs 71% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 254.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+254.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($86) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 and Radeon R7 M365X

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Radeon R7 M365X
The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 scores 837 and the Radeon R7 M365X reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon R7 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M365X). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 837+2% | 824 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+1100% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS+6374% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+170% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+1100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 384+1100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+2208% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M365X) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 draws 295W versus the Radeon R7 M365X's 75W — a 118.9% difference. The Radeon R7 M365X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M365X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 75W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8 | 11.0+293% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119 MSRP and currently averages $86, while the Radeon R7 M365X launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 costs 71.3% less ($214 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.7 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers 259.3% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $119-60% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $86-71% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.7+259% | 2.7 |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Tropo |
| Release | April 13 2023 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #26 | #715 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















