Radeon R9 260 vs FirePro V7000
Radeon R9 260
Popular choices:
FirePro V7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 260.
| Insight | Radeon R9 260 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 260 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $100), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 141% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 260 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+141%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 260 and FirePro V7000
Radeon R9 260
The Radeon R9 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $399.
FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 260 scores 3,048 and the FirePro V7000 reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 260 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro V7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 260) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7000). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 260) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000).
| Feature | Radeon R9 260 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,048 | 3,162+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.849 TFLOPS+99% | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+100% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 260 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 260 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7000 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 260) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) — the Radeon R9 260 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 260 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 260 draws 275W versus the FirePro V7000's 150W — a 58.8% difference. The FirePro V7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 260) vs 350W (FirePro V7000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 260 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 11.1 | 21.1+90% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 260 launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro V7000 launched at $899 and now averages $100. The Radeon R9 260 costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.2 (Radeon R9 260) vs 31.6 (FirePro V7000) — the Radeon R9 260 offers 141.1% better value. The Radeon R9 260 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 260 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-85% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-60% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.2+141% | 31.6 |
| Codename | Hawaii | Pitcairn |
| Release | November 5 2013 | August 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #316 | #462 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 260 and FirePro V7000
