Radeon R9 290 / 390
VS
Quadro M5500

Radeon R9 290 / 390 vs Quadro M5500

AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

2016Core: 1140 MHzBoost: 1165 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5500

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
91%
#126
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1494%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
100%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
100%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
99%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
97%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
95%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
93%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
93%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
92%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
91%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M5500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (275mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 290 / 390 holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $200), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 216.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+216.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($65)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290 / 390 and Quadro M5500

AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.

NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 scores 8,150 and the Quadro M5500 reaches 7,915 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro M5500 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5500). Raw compute: 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1165 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
G3D Mark Score
8,150+3%
7,915
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+25%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.12 TFLOPS+7%
4.772 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1165 MHz+17%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160+25%
128
L1 Cache
640 KB
768 KB+20%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5500 has 8 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5500) — the Quadro M5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
512-bit+100%
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
DirectX
12.0
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (Maxwell). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500).

FeatureRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC (Maxwell)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 draws 300W versus the Quadro M5500's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro M5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 350W (Quadro M5500). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 85.

FeatureRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
TDP
300W
150W-50%
Recommended PSU
750W
350W-53%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
275mm
0mm
Height
109mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
95°C
85-11%
Perf/Watt
27.2
52.8+94%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Quadro M5500 launched at $800 and now averages $200. The Radeon R9 290 / 390 costs 67.5% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 125.4 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) vs 39.6 (Quadro M5500) — the Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers 216.7% better value. The Quadro M5500 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 290 / 390Quadro M5500
MSRP
$329-59%
$800
Avg Price (30d)
$65-68%
$200
Performance per Dollar
125.4+217%
39.6
Codename
Grenada
GM204
Release
June 18 2015
April 8 2016
Ranking
#296
#321