
Radeon R9 M265X vs GeForce 940M

Radeon R9 M265X
Popular choices:

GeForce 940M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M265X is positioned at rank #448 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M265X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M265X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 940M.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M265X | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M265X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M265X and GeForce 940M

Radeon R9 M265X
The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

GeForce 940M
The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M265X scores 1,167 and the GeForce 940M reaches 1,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M265X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 940M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 384 (GeForce 940M). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 940M). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,167+3% | 1,133 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8 TFLOPS | 0.9032 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 1176 MHz+88% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M265X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940M has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M265X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 1 MB (GeForce 940M) — the GeForce 940M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M265X draws 75W versus the GeForce 940M's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 940M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 350W (GeForce 940M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 33W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.6 | 34.3+120% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 940M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Venus | GM108 |
| Release | March 21 2014 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #839 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















