
Radeon R9 M265X vs Radeon HD 5750

Radeon R9 M265X
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M265X is positioned at rank 448 and the Radeon HD 5750 is on rank 143, so the Radeon HD 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M265X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M265X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M265X | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $30), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 20.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M265X | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M265X and Radeon HD 5750

Radeon R9 M265X
The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M265X scores 1,167 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M265X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,167 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 720+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+26% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+11% | 36 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+122% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M265X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The Radeon R9 M265X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M265X draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 13.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M265X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-13% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 15.6+15% | 13.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 5750 costs 16.7% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.9 (Radeon R9 M265X) vs 46.8 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 20.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M265X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M265X | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $130-35% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $25-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.9 | 46.8+20% |
| Codename | Venus | Juniper |
| Release | March 21 2014 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #839 | #834 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















