
Radeon R9 M290X vs GRID P4-2Q

Radeon R9 M290X
Popular choices:

GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M290X is positioned at rank 399 and the GRID P4-2Q is on rank 285, so the GRID P4-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M290X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-2Q.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M290X | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M290X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M290X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $235), it costs 74% less, resulting in a 298.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M290X | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+298.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($235) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M290X and GRID P4-2Q

Radeon R9 M290X
The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.

GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M290X scores 3,218 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,218+2% | 3,162 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+109% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1178 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M290X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-2Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M290X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M290X draws 100W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 32.2+128% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GRID P4-2Q launched at $1500 and now averages $235. The Radeon R9 M290X costs 74.5% less ($175 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.6 (Radeon R9 M290X) vs 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) — the Radeon R9 M290X offers 297% better value. The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-73% | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-74% | $235 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.6+297% | 13.5 |
| Codename | Neptune | GM204 |
| Release | January 9 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #566 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















