Radeon R9 M365X
VS
GeForce GT 740

Radeon R9 M365X vs GeForce GT 740

AMD

Radeon R9 M365X

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740

2014Core: 993 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M365X is positioned at rank 445 and the GeForce GT 740 is on rank 89, so the GeForce GT 740 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M365X

#435
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1831%
#437
1660%
#438
1655%
#442
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1505%
#443
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1495%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
99%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
98%
#449
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#450
Radeon R5 M435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#451
Radeon E8860
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
95%
#452
Radeon R7 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#453
Radeon HD 7650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
94%
#454
GeForce 820A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#455
94%
#456
Radeon HD 7850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
93%
#457
93%
#458
92%
#459
Radeon HD 8450G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#460
Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 740

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
452%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
434%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
429%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
428%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
427%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
425%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
419%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
418%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
414%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
413%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
408%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
407%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
400%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
400%
#74
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
498%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
91%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
90%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
86%
#89
GeForce GT 740
MSRP: $89|Avg: $89
100%
#90
Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
97%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
91%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
89%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
86%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
86%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
84%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
84%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
81%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M365X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 740.

InsightRadeon R9 M365XGeForce GT 740
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M365X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M365X holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $89), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 84.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M365XGeForce GT 740
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+84.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($89)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M365X and GeForce GT 740

AMD

Radeon R9 M365X

The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740

The GeForce GT 740 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,429 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M365X scores 1,482 and the GeForce GT 740 reaches 1,429 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M365X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 740 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M365X) vs 384 (GeForce GT 740). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M365X) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740).

FeatureRadeon R9 M365XGeForce GT 740
G3D Mark Score
1,482+4%
1,429
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.184 TFLOPS+55%
0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+25%
32
L1 Cache
160 KB+400%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M365XGeForce GT 740
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M365X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 740 has 1 GB. The Radeon R9 M365X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 M365XGeForce GT 740
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M365X draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 740's 64W — a 15.8% difference. The GeForce GT 740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M365X) vs 300W (GeForce GT 740). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureRadeon R9 M365XGeForce GT 740
TDP
75W
64W-15%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Length
145mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
19.8
22.3+13%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M365X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GT 740 launched at $89 and now averages $89. The Radeon R9 M365X costs 43.8% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.6 (Radeon R9 M365X) vs 16.1 (GeForce GT 740) — the Radeon R9 M365X offers 83.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M365X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 M365XGeForce GT 740
MSRP
$250
$89-64%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-44%
$89
Performance per Dollar
29.6+84%
16.1
Codename
Tropo
GK107
Release
May 5 2015
May 29 2014
Ranking
#769
#777