
Radeon R9 M365X vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Radeon R9 M365X
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M365X is positioned at rank 445 and the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is on rank 185, so the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M365X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M365X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M365X | Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M365X | Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M365X and Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Radeon R9 M365X
The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 1 2016. It features the GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M365X scores 1,482 and the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M365X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) uses GCN 1.2/2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M365X) vs 384 (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M365X | Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,482 | 1,500+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz+16% | 800 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M365X | Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M365X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M365X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M365X | Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M365X draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)'s 12W — a 144.8% difference. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M365X) vs 350W (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M365X | Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 12W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 19.8 | 125.0+531% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M365X launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) launched at $50 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.6 (Radeon R9 M365X) vs 30.0 (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)) — the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) offers 1.4% better value. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M365X | Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $50-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.6 | 30.0+1% |
| Codename | Tropo | Bristol Ridge |
| Release | May 5 2015 | June 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #769 | #904 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















