Radeon R9 M385X
VS
FirePro V7800

Radeon R9 M385X vs FirePro V7800

AMD

Radeon R9 M385X

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
VS

FirePro V7800

2011Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M385X is positioned at rank 429 and the FirePro V7800 is on rank 257, so the FirePro V7800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385X

#419
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1633%
#421
1480%
#422
1476%
#426
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1342%
#427
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1333%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#431
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
99%
#432
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
99%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
97%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
97%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#438
Radeon R3
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#439
94%
#441
Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
#443
Radeon R9 M360
MSRP: $300|Avg: $81
91%
#444
Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
100%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#240
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5533%
#256
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
100%
#258
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#259
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#260
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
96%
#263
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#264
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#265
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#266
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
93%
#267
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#268
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#269
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#270
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M385X.

InsightRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro V7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V7800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $96 (vs $300), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 217.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+217.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($96)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M385X and FirePro V7800

AMD

Radeon R9 M385X

The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

AMD

FirePro V7800

The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M385X scores 1,994 and the FirePro V7800 reaches 2,028 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M385X is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro V7800 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7800). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800).

FeatureRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
G3D Mark Score
1,994
2,028+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
896
1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.971 TFLOPS+6%
1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
56
80+43%
L1 Cache
224 KB
320 KB+43%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M385X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 512 KB (FirePro V7800) — the FirePro V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7800). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
DirectX
12 (12_0)+7%
11.2
Vulkan
1.2
None
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X) vs None (FirePro V7800). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7800).

FeatureRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
Encoder
VCE 2.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 2.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M385X draws 75W versus the FirePro V7800's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 350W (FirePro V7800). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 254mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
254mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.6+97%
13.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the FirePro V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $96. The FirePro V7800 costs 68% less ($204 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 21.1 (FirePro V7800) — the FirePro V7800 offers 219.7% better value. The Radeon R9 M385X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon R9 M385XFirePro V7800
MSRP
$300-60%
$759
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$96-68%
Performance per Dollar
6.6
21.1+220%
Codename
Strato
Cayman
Release
May 5 2015
May 24 2011
Ranking
#681
#656