
Radeon R9 M385X vs Radeon HD 5850

Radeon R9 M385X
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M385X is positioned at rank #429 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R9 M385X is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Radeon R9 M385X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 5850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M385X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 5850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $300), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 880.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+880.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M385X and Radeon HD 5850

Radeon R9 M385X
The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

Radeon HD 5850
The Radeon HD 5850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,955 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M385X scores 1,994 and the Radeon HD 5850 reaches 1,955 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M385X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon HD 5850 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 1,440 (Radeon HD 5850). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5850).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,994+2% | 1,955 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1440+61% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS | 2.088 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 72+29% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+56% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M385X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5850 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 5850 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5850) — the Radeon HD 5850 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5850).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M385X draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5850's 151W — a 67.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 500W (Radeon HD 5850). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 151W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.6+106% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon HD 5850 launched at $299 and now averages $30. The Radeon HD 5850 costs 90% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) vs 65.2 (Radeon HD 5850) — the Radeon HD 5850 offers 887.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M385X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385X | Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $30-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6 | 65.2+888% |
| Codename | Strato | Cypress |
| Release | May 5 2015 | September 30 2009 |
| Ranking | #681 | #682 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















