
Radeon R9 M470 vs FirePro D500

Radeon R9 M470
Popular choices:

FirePro D500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M470 is positioned at rank 428 and the FirePro D500 is on rank 226, so the FirePro D500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M470
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M470 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro D500.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M470 | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M470 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M470 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $150), it costs 47% less, resulting in a 92.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M470 | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M470 and FirePro D500

Radeon R9 M470
The Radeon R9 M470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,331 points.

FirePro D500
The FirePro D500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,272 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M470 scores 2,331 and the FirePro D500 reaches 2,272 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M470 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro D500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R9 M470) vs 1,536 (FirePro D500). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470) vs 2.227 TFLOPS (FirePro D500).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,331+3% | 2,272 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS | 2.227 TFLOPS+45% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M470) vs 768 KB (FirePro D500) — the FirePro D500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M470 draws 75W versus the FirePro D500's 274W — a 114% difference. The Radeon R9 M470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M470) vs 350W (FirePro D500). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-73% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1+275% | 8.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M470 launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the FirePro D500 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M470 costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.1 (Radeon R9 M470) vs 15.1 (FirePro D500) — the Radeon R9 M470 offers 92.7% better value. The Radeon R9 M470 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-30% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-47% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.1+93% | 15.1 |
| Codename | Emerald | Tahiti |
| Release | May 15 2016 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #649 | #484 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















