
Radeon R9 M470 vs GRID M10-1Q

Radeon R9 M470
Popular choices:

GRID M10-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M470 is positioned at rank #428 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M470
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M470 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M470 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M470 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M470 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $500), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 510.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M470 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+510.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M470 and GRID M10-1Q

Radeon R9 M470
The Radeon R9 M470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,331 points.

GRID M10-1Q
The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M470 scores 2,331 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M470 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R9 M470) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,331 | 2,385+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+214% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1178 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 768 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M470 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-1Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M470 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M470) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M470 draws 75W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M470) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1+193% | 10.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M470 launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Radeon R9 M470 costs 84% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.1 (Radeon R9 M470) vs 4.8 (GRID M10-1Q) — the Radeon R9 M470 offers 506.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M470 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470 | GRID M10-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-84% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.1+506% | 4.8 |
| Codename | Emerald | GM204 |
| Release | May 15 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #649 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















