
Radeon RX 470 (móvel) vs FirePro W8100

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Popular choices:

FirePro W8100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is positioned at rank 114 and the FirePro W8100 is on rank 254, so the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W8100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $200), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 413.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+413.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 470 (móvel) and FirePro W8100

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) scores 7,000 and the FirePro W8100 reaches 6,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro W8100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 2,560 (FirePro W8100). Raw compute: 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000+3% | 6,812 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.399 TFLOPS+4% | 4.219 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 640 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (FirePro W8100) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 12 (FirePro W8100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) draws 85W versus the FirePro W8100's 220W — a 88.5% difference. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 350W (FirePro W8100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 87°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-61% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-8% | 87°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.4+166% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 and now averages $200. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) costs 80% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 175.0 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 34.1 (FirePro W8100) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers 413.2% better value. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-93% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-80% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 175.0+413% | 34.1 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Hawaii |
| Release | August 4 2016 | June 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #360 | #361 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















