CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Quadro P2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is positioned at rank 114 and the Quadro P2000 is on rank 89, so the Quadro P2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+25%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $190), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 377.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+377.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($190) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 470 (móvel) and Quadro P2000
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.
Quadro P2000
The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) scores 7,000 and the Quadro P2000 reaches 6,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1074 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 6,964 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.399 TFLOPS+45% | 3.031 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1074 MHz | 1480 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 has 5 GB. The Quadro P2000 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 5 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) draws 85W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 201mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 75W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 201mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 82.4 | 92.9+13% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425 and now averages $190. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) costs 78.9% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 175.0 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) vs 36.7 (Quadro P2000) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) offers 376.8% better value. The Quadro P2000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) | Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-58% | $425 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-79% | $190 |
| Performance per Dollar | 175.0+377% | 36.7 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GP106 |
| Release | August 4 2016 | February 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #360 | #346 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 470 (móvel) and Quadro P2000
