
Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX Titan

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX Titan.
| Insight | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $55 (vs $70), it costs 21% less, resulting in a 33% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($55) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 480 and GeForce GTX Titan

Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 480 scores 8,546 and the GeForce GTX Titan reaches 8,181 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX Titan uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 480) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan). Raw compute: 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480) vs 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,546+4% | 8,181 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2688+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.834 TFLOPS+24% | 4.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1266 MHz+45% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 224+56% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+157% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 480 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX Titan has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX Titan. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 288 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 480) vs 12 (GeForce GTX Titan). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 480 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX Titan's 250W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 480) vs 600W (GeForce GTX Titan). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 95mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.0+74% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 480 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 and now averages $70. The Radeon RX 480 costs 21.4% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 155.4 (Radeon RX 480) vs 116.9 (GeForce GTX Titan) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 32.9% better value. The Radeon RX 480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-77% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55-21% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 155.4+33% | 116.9 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GK110 |
| Release | June 29 2016 | February 19 2013 |
| Ranking | #305 | #311 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















