
Radeon RX 480 vs CMP 40HX

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:

CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 40HX uses modern memory architecture. The CMP 40HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 480 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The CMP 40HX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 480 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $55 versus $120 for the CMP 40HX, it costs 54% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 113.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+113.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($55) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 480 and CMP 40HX

Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 480 scores 8,546 and the CMP 40HX reaches 8,749 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the CMP 40HX uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 480) vs 2,304 (CMP 40HX). Raw compute: 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480) vs 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,546 | 8,749+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.834 TFLOPS | 7.603 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1266 MHz | 1650 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 2.3 MB+311% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 480 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 40HX has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) vs 4 MB (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 480) vs 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480) vs No (CMP 40HX). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs No.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 480 draws 150W versus the CMP 40HX's 185W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 480) vs 500W (CMP 40HX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-19% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 229mm |
| Height | 95mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.0+21% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 480 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the CMP 40HX launched at $699 and now averages $120. The Radeon RX 480 costs 54.2% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 155.4 (Radeon RX 480) vs 72.9 (CMP 40HX) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 113.2% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-67% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55-54% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 155.4+113% | 72.9 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | TU106 |
| Release | June 29 2016 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #305 | #302 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











