GeForce RTX 3070 vs CMP 40HX
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 153.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 40HX.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+153.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-153.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $120), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 52.1% better value per dollar than the CMP 40HX.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and CMP 40HX
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the CMP 40HX's 8,749 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 153.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the CMP 40HX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,304 (CMP 40HX). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 36 (CMP 40HX) with 184 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+153% | 8,749 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+167% | 7.603 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+5% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+152% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+28% | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 288+57% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 40HX has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs No (CMP 40HX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs No.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | No |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the CMP 40HX's 185W — a 17.3% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (CMP 40HX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 185W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+113% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the CMP 40HX launched at $699 and now averages $120. The CMP 40HX costs 40% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72.9 (CMP 40HX) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 52.1% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-29% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $120-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+52% | 72.9 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU106 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #63 | #302 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and CMP 40HX
