
Radeon RX 550X (móvel) vs Radeon 680M

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon 680M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) is positioned at rank 6 and the Radeon 680M is on rank 331, so the Radeon RX 550X (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 680M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 680M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 550X (móvel).
| Insight | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $35 versus $80 for the Radeon 680M, it costs 56% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 126.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+126.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550X (móvel) and Radeon 680M

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,800 points.

Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) scores 3,800 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1287 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,800 | 3,836 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 768+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.647 TFLOPS | 3.379 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 1287 MHz | 2200 MHz+71% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 256 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 76.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) costs 56.3% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 108.6 (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)) vs 48.0 (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon RX 550X (móvel) offers 126.3% better value. The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-56% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.6+126% | 48.0 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | April 11 2018 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #648 | #512 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















