
Radeon RX 570 vs Quadro T2000

Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:

Quadro T2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 570 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon RX 570 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro T2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 570.
| Insight | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $75), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 43.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+43.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 570 and Quadro T2000

Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.

Quadro T2000
The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 570 scores 6,967 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 570) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,967 | 7,279+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.095 TFLOPS+961% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the Radeon RX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 570) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 570 draws 120W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 63.7% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 570) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 62W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 120mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 58.1 | 117.4+102% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 570 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600 and now averages $75. The Radeon RX 570 costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 139.3 (Radeon RX 570) vs 97.1 (Quadro T2000) — the Radeon RX 570 offers 43.5% better value. The Radeon RX 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon RX 570 | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-72% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-33% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 139.3+43% | 97.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GF106 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #356 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











