Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 105.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+105.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-105.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (272mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $300 for the Radeon RX 5700 XT, it costs 75% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 94.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+94.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 XT and GeForce GTX 1650
Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1905 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,183 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,183 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon RX 5700 XT leads by 105.7%. The Radeon RX 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 9.754 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1905 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,183+106% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+186% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.754 TFLOPS+227% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1905 MHz+14% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+186% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5700 XT comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 250% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon RX 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+250% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 XT draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None. Card length: 272mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 300W-50% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
| Length | 272mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 71.9 | 104.9+46% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 XT launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75% less ($225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.9 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 94.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $149-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $75-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.9 | 104.9+95% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | TU117 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #128 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5700 XT and GeForce GTX 1650
