
Radeon RX 5700 XT

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1905 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,183 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,183 and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 15,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 9.754 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1905 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,183+2% | 15,848 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.754 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1905 MHz | 2000 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5700 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 5700 XT and 128-bit on the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: UVD vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 XT draws 225W versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 115W — a 64.7% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700 XT) vs 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 272mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 115W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 272mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.9 | 137.8+92% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 XT | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD106 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #128 | #134 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















