Radeon RX 6500M
VS
RadeonT 780M

Radeon RX 6500M vs RadeonT 780M

AMD

Radeon RX 6500M

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
VS
AMD

RadeonT 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6500M is positioned at rank 73 and the RadeonT 780M is on rank 142, so the Radeon RX 6500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500M

#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
99%
#63
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
219%
#65
198%
#66
198%
#70
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
180%
#71
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
179%
#73
Radeon RX 6500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
98%
#82
Arc 7-Core iGPU
MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A
95%
#87
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 780M

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
97%
#132
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
306%
#134
277%
#135
277%
#139
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
252%
#140
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
250%
#142
RadeonT 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
98%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
98%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 6500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 780M.

InsightRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+4.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500M and RadeonT 780M

AMD

Radeon RX 6500M

The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.

AMD

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6500M scores 7,443 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6500M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score
7,443+5%
7,098
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1024+33%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.915 TFLOPS
8.909 TFLOPS+81%
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2900 MHz+21%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64+33%
48
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
16+33%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the RadeonT 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6500M draws 50W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 6500M) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureRadeon RX 6500MRadeonT 780M
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
148.9
473.2+218%