GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon RX 6500M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅108.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the Radeon RX 6500M reaches 7,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,525+1% | 7,443 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 4.915 TFLOPS+245% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 256 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500M) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6500M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the Radeon RX 6500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+33% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 (Volta) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 150.5+1% | 148.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 6500M (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Codename | GK106 | Navi 24 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #633 | #341 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX 6500M
