GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012Core: 928 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 6500

RX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

4 GB 50

7,525

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon RX 6500

4 GB 75

7,610

+1.1%

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Radeon RX 5300M

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon RX 6500

Why buy it

✅54.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Unknown architecture on Unknown node gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
32.7% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (7,610 vs 7,525), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.2% (50.2 vs 38.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6500 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 6500

The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon RX 6500
G3D Mark Score	7,525	7,610+1%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon RX 6500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6500.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon RX 6500
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+33%	144 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon RX 6500
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon RX 6500
Encoder	NVENC 6 (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon RX 6500
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	400W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	172mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	150.5+48%	101.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 31.4% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	Radeon RX 6500
MSRP	$150-25%	$199
Performance per Dollar	50.2+31%	38.2
Codename	GK106	—
Release	October 9 2012	sem dados
Ranking	#633	#335

Search GeForce GTX 1650 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.