
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

T1000
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,525 | 7,649+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 2.5 TFLOPS+75% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 896 KB+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T1000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 128-bit on the T1000. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the T1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 (Volta) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the T1000's 50W — a 0% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 156mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 150.5 | 153.0+2% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the T1000 launched at $350. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti was 57.1% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 129.2% better value. The newer card here is T1000 (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-57% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2+129% | 21.9 |
| Codename | GK106 | TU117 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #633 | #333 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














