GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce RTX 2050
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 215W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅218.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce RTX 2050 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌330% higher power demand at 215W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the GeForce RTX 2050 reaches 7,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 2050 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,525 | 7,714+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2944+283% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 10.07 TFLOPS+607% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 64 | 184+188% |
| L1 Cache | 0.06 MB | 2.9 MB+4733% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+71% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 (Volta) | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 2050's 215W — a 124.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 2050). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 150.5+319% | 35.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 2.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2050 (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2 | 51.4+2% |
| Codename | GK106 | TU104 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #633 | #94 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce RTX 2050
