GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012Core: 928 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 580X

2019Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $450 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 299.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro 580X

2019

Why buy it

  • 171.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro 580X is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 300% HIGHER MSRP
    $600 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 580X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 171.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (7,540 vs 7,525), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 580X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $450 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 299.2% (50.2 vs 12.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 580X has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon Pro 580X

The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiRadeon Pro 580X
G3D Mark Score
7,525
7,540
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
2304+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.425 TFLOPS
5.53 TFLOPS+288%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
64
144+125%
L1 Cache
64 KB
576 KB+800%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 580X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiRadeon Pro 580X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 580X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 580X. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) — the Radeon Pro 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiRadeon Pro 580X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiRadeon Pro 580X
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiRadeon Pro 580X
Encoder
NVENC 6 (Volta)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC 4
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiRadeon Pro 580X
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
150.5+199%
50.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti was 75% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 298.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 580X (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiRadeon Pro 580X
MSRP
$150-75%
$600
Performance per Dollar
50.2+298%
12.6
Codename
GK106
Polaris 20
Release
October 9 2012
March 18 2019
Ranking
#633
#339

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.