
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Radeon Pro 580X
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 299.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅171.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro 580X is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌300% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon Pro 580X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,525 | 7,540 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+288% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 144+125% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 576 KB+800% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 580X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 580X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 580X. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) — the Radeon Pro 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 (Volta) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 150.5+199% | 50.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti was 75% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 298.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 580X (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2+298% | 12.6 |
| Codename | GK106 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #633 | #339 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














