Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GRID P40-8Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012Core: 928 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P40-8Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
····
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GRID P40-8Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
4 GB 50
7,525
+0.2%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU
GRID P40-8Q
4 GB 225
7,507
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GRID P40-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1904.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GRID P40-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    1900% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (7,525 vs 7,507), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,850 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1904.8% (50.2 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GRID P40-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-8Q

The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 and the GRID P40-8Q reaches 7,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GRID P40-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiGRID P40-8Q
G3D Mark Score
7,525
7,507
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.425 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+239%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
64 KB
768 KB+1100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiGRID P40-8Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiGRID P40-8Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiGRID P40-8Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiGRID P40-8Q
Encoder
NVENC 6 (Volta)
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the GRID P40-8Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P40-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiGRID P40-8Q
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75
—
Perf/Watt
150.5+351%
33.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti was 95% cheaper ($2850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 1908% better value. The newer card here is GRID P40-8Q (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 TiGRID P40-8Q
MSRP
$150-95%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
50.2+1908%
2.5
Codename
GK106
GM204
Release
October 9 2012
August 30 2015
Ranking
#633
#505
Search GeForce GTX 1650 Ti on AmazonSearch GRID P40-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.