Radeon RX 6600 vs Quadro RTX 4000
Radeon RX 6600
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 4000.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $220 for the Quadro RTX 4000, it costs 18% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 23.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($180) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($220) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6600 and Quadro RTX 4000
Radeon RX 6600
The Radeon RX 6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,089 points. Launch price was $329.
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6600 scores 15,089 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 2491 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6600) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 288.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,089+1% | 14,925 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.928 TFLOPS+25% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2491 MHz+61% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.3 MB+360% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 36+29% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6600) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 6600) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6600 draws 132W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 19.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 6600) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W-18% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 241mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 114.3+23% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6600 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $180, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899 and now averages $220. The Radeon RX 6600 costs 18.2% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.8 (Radeon RX 6600) vs 67.8 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the Radeon RX 6600 offers 23.6% better value. The Radeon RX 6600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-63% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180-18% | $220 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.8+24% | 67.8 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | TU104 |
| Release | October 13 2021 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #150 | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6600 and Quadro RTX 4000
