Radeon RX 6600 vs Radeon PRO W6600
Radeon RX 6600
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6600.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $649 for the Radeon PRO W6600, it costs 72% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 264.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+264.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($180) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($649) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6600 and Radeon PRO W6600
Radeon RX 6600
The Radeon RX 6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,089 points. Launch price was $329.
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6600 scores 15,089 and the Radeon PRO W6600 reaches 14,932 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600). Raw compute: 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600) vs 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600). Boost clocks: 2491 MHz vs 2903 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6600) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,089+1% | 14,932 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.928 TFLOPS | 10.4 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 2491 MHz | 2903 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6600) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE (Radeon RX 6600) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600). Decoder: UVD vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6600 draws 132W versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 100W — a 27.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 6600) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W | 100W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 190mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 114.3 | 149.3+31% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6600 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $180, while the Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649 and now averages $649. The Radeon RX 6600 costs 72.3% less ($469 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.8 (Radeon RX 6600) vs 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Radeon RX 6600 offers 264.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-49% | $649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180-72% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.8+264% | 23.0 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 13 2021 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #150 | #153 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6600 and Radeon PRO W6600
