
Radeon RX 6800 XT

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Radeon RX 6800 XT vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 6800 XT vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 6800 XT vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 6800 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.5 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅10.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌208% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 38.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6800 XT vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 6800 XT
The Radeon RX 6800 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,995 points. Launch price was $649.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 24,995 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 6%. The Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 20.74 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 280.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,995 | 26,498+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 8960+94% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.74 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz+9% | 2055 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+33% | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+3% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 8.8 MB+780% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+3% | 70 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6800 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6800 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6800 XT has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell carries 24 GB. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 18.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800 XT. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 6800 XT and 192-bit on the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+19% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6800 XT draws 300W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 140W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.3 | 189.3+127% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 6800 XT came in at $649, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6800 XT was 67.5% cheaper ($1350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.5 (Radeon RX 6800 XT) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX 6800 XT offers 189.5% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-68% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.5+189% | 13.3 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GB203 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #42 | #48 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














