Radeon RX 6800M vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon RX 6800M
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6800M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6800M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6800M | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6800M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6800M and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon RX 6800M
The Radeon RX 6800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2116 MHz to 2390 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,295 points.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6800M scores 13,295 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6800M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6800M) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 12.24 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800M) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 2390 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6800M) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800M | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,295 | 13,182 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840 ×2+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.24 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+23% |
| Boost Clock | 2390 MHz+22% | 1967 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240 ×2+50% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60 ×2+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6800M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800M | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6800M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6800M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800M) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6800M) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800M | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 864 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6800M) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800M | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800M) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800M | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6800M draws 145W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 93.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6800M) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800M | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 145W-64% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 280mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.7+178% | 33.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6800M and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
