Radeon RX 6850M XT
VS
Radeon 8060S

Radeon RX 6850M XT vs Radeon 8060S

AMD

Radeon RX 6850M XT

2022Core: 2321 MHzBoost: 2581 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 8060S

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6850M XT

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
159%
#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
150%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
148%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
145%
#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
104%
#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
100%
#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
91%
#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
71%
#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
69%
#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8060S

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
154%
#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
145%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
142%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
140%
#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
100%
#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
96%
#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
88%
#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 8060S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6850M XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.5 / 4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon 8060S offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $800 (vs $800), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX 6850M XT.

InsightRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3.7%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6850M XT and Radeon 8060S

AMD

Radeon RX 6850M XT

The Radeon RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,350 points.

AMD

Radeon 8060S

The Radeon 8060S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,989 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 17,350 and the Radeon 8060S reaches 17,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6850M XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon 8060S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 2,560 (Radeon 8060S). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (Radeon 8060S). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 40 (Radeon 8060S).

FeatureRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
G3D Mark Score
17,350
17,989+4%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
7 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
2560
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
13.21 TFLOPS
14.85 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock
2581 MHz
2900 MHz+12%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
160
L2 Cache
3 MB
8 MB+167%
Ray Tracing Cores
40
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6850M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 8060S lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6850M XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8060S has 0 MB. The Radeon RX 6850M XT offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon 8060S) — a 68.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 6850M XT. Bus width: 192-bit vs System Shared. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8060S) — the Radeon 8060S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
none
Memory Type
GDDR6
LPDDR5X (Shared)
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s+69%
256 GB/s (Max)
Bus Width
192-bit
System Shared
L2 Cache
3 MB
8 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8060S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8060S). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8060S).

FeatureRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.5
Decoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6850M XT draws 165W versus the Radeon 8060S's 55W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 8060S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 650W (Radeon 8060S). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
TDP
165W
55W-67%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
105.2
327.1+211%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6850M XT launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the Radeon 8060S launched at $800 and now averages $800. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.7 (Radeon RX 6850M XT) vs 22.5 (Radeon 8060S) — the Radeon 8060S offers 3.7% better value. The Radeon 8060S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon RX 6850M XTRadeon 8060S
MSRP
$800
$800
Avg Price (30d)
$800
$800
Performance per Dollar
21.7
22.5+4%
Codename
Navi 22
Strix Halo
Release
January 4 2022
January 6 2025
Ranking
#103
#98