
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+136.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2540.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1015.2% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Radeon RX 7600
2023Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅+136.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2540.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1015.2% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Tesla M60

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Tesla M60's 7,002 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 136.8%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+137% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+351% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+125% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-45% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5+331% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 91% less ($2731 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 2578.3% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-91% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.6+2578% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GM204 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #118 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












