Radeon RX 7600M vs Tesla M40 24GB
Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:
Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600M
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M40 24GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 7600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M40 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M40 24GB.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600M and Tesla M40 24GB
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7600M scores 10,999 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 2410 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,999+3% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.27 TFLOPS+153% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2410 MHz+117% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.1 MB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M40 24GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600M draws 90W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 94.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-64% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 122.2+187% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GM200 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #248 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600M and Tesla M40 24GB
